1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 806 F.3d
  5. 806 F.3d 411 (2015)
 

NORTON v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, ILL.

No. 13-3581.

806 F.3d 411 (2015)

Don NORTON and Karen Otterson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

August 7, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark G. Weinberg , Law office of Mark G. Weinberg, Adele D. Nicholas , Chicago, IL, Matthew A. Brill , Noel E. Miller , Matthew Murchison , Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Steven C. Rahn , Matthew Robert Trapp , Office of the Corporation Counsel, Springfield, IL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before EASTERBROOK, MANION, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.

Our first decision in this appeal concluded that Springfield's anti-panhandling ordinance does not draw lines based on the content of anyone's speech. Because the litigants agreed that the ordinance's validity depends on this issue, we affirmed the district court's decision. 768 F.3d 713

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases