1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 788 F.3d
  5. 788 F.3d 946 (2015)
 

DOE I v. NESTLE USA, INC.

No. 10-56739.

788 F.3d 946 (2015)

JOHN DOE I; John Doe II; John Doe III, individually and on behalf of proposed class members; Global Exchange, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NESTLE USA, INC.; Archer Daniels Midland Company; Cargill Incorporated Company; Cargill Cocoa, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Amended June 10, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terrence Patrick Collingsworth, Esquire , Senior Partner, Conrad & Scherer, LLP, Washington, DC, Paul L. Hoffman , Schonbrun Desimone Seplow Harris & Hoffman, Venice, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Craig A. Hoover , Neal Katyal , Dominic Francis Perella, Esquire , Hogan Lovells U.S. LLP, Washington, DC, Julie A. Shepard , Jenner & Block, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee, Nestle USA, Inc.

Jonathan H. Blavin , Kristin Linsley Myles, Esquire , Munger Tolles & Olson, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Brad D. Brian, Esquire , Daniel Paul Collins , Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee, Archer Daniels Midland Company.

Andrew John Pincus , Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, Lee H. Rubin , Mayer Brown LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Defendants-Appellees, Cargill Incorporated Company and Cargill Cocoa.

Before: DOROTHY W. NELSON, KIM McLANE WARDLAW, and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Judge Rawlinson voted to grant the petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc.

Judge Nelson and Judge Wardlaw voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Wardlaw voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Nelson so recommended.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases