LELO INC. v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COM'N

No. 2013-1582.

786 F.3d 879 (2015)

LELO INC., Leloi AB, Appellants v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee. Standard Innovation (US) Corp., Standard Innovation Corporation, Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 11, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hector Julian Ribera, Fenwick & West LLP, Mountain View, CA, argued for appellants. Also represented by Marion N.G. Miller;   Lauren Estelle Whittemore, San Francisco, CA.

Michael Haldenstein, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by Dominic L. Bianchi,   James A. Worth.

Paul Whitfield Hughes, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenors. Also represented by Gary Hnath;   Robert P. Lord,   Lisa E. Margonis,   Tammy J. Terry,   Carlyn Anne Burton, Osha Liang LLP, Houston, TX.

Before MOORE, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.


Appellants appeal the finding of the U.S. International Trade Commission that the domestic industry requirements of § 337 were satisfied upon a showing of a "significant investment in plant or equipment" and a "significant employment of labor or capital."1 See 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases