1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 784 F.3d
  5. 784 F.3d 520 (2015)
 

IN RE COUNTY OF ORANGE

No. 14-72343.

784 F.3d 520 (2015)

In re COUNTY OF ORANGE. County of Orange, a political subdivision of the State of California, Petitioner, v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Santa Ana, Respondent, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., an Indian corporation; Tata America International Corporation, a New York corporation, Real Parties in Interest.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed April 16, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin Parker Broderick (argued), Allan L. Schare,   Alexander George Brizolis, and Todd Theodora, Theodora Oringher P.C., Costa Mesa, CA, for Petitioner.

William A. Escobar (argued), Kelley Drey & Warren LLP, New York, New York; Allison S. Brehm and Kenneth David Kronstadt, Kelley Drey & Warren LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Real Parties in Interest.

Before: RONALD M. GOULD and RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and EDWARD R. KORMAN, Senior District Judge.

OPINION

This mandamus petition requires us to decide whether, under Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938), a federal court sitting in diversity applies state or federal law to determine the validity of a pre-dispute jury trial waiver contained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases