1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 782 F.3d
  5. 782 F.3d 1371 (2015)
 

OPLUS TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. v. VIZIO, INC.

No. 2014-1297.

782 F.3d 1371 (2015)

OPLUS TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellee v. VIZIO, INC., Defendant-Appellant Sears Holdings Corporation, Defendant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 10, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Joffre, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by Arthur A. Gasey ; Daniel R. Ferri,   Raymond Pardo Niro, I, Niro, Haller & Niro, Chicago, IL.

Adrian Mary Pruetz, Glaser, Weil, Fink, Jacobs, Howard, Avchen & Shapiro LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by Charles Christian Koole,   Dan Liu,   Mieke K. Malmberg.

Before PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

Vizio, Inc. appeals from the district court's denial of attorneys' and expert witness fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285, 28 U.S.C. § 1927, and the court's inherent power. We hold that the district court abused its discretion in denying fees, and thus vacate and remand.

BACKGROUND

Oplus Technologies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases