U.S. v. TAMMAN

No. 13-50463.

782 F.3d 543 (2015)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David TAMMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed April 3, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan M. Dershowitz (argued), Cambridge, MA; David Duncan , Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP, Boston, MA; William J. Genego , Santa Monica, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Paul G. Stern (argued) and Elana Shavit Artson , Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before: WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and JAY S. BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVID ALAN EZRA, District Judge.


OPINION

Appellant David Tamman raises five issues in his appeal from the district court's judgment of conviction and sentence. We begin by addressing an issue of first impression, that is, whether the district court erred at sentencing by applying both the "Broker-Dealer" enhancement under United States Sentencing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases