1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 775 F.3d
  5. 775 F.3d 1193 (2015)
 

IBARRA v. MANHEIM INVESTMENTS, INC.

No. 14-56779.

775 F.3d 1193 (2015)

Jose L. IBARRA, an individual; Does, 1-50, on behalf of themselves and in a representative capacity for all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MANHEIM INVESTMENTS, INC., a Nevada Corporation; Cox Enterprises, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed January 8, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas R. Kaufman (argued), and Paul Berkowitz , Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellants.

Raul Cadena (argued), Cadena Churchill, LLP, San Diego, CA; Paul D. Jackson , Jackson Law, LLP, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before: SUSAN P. GRABER, RONALD M. GOULD, and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

We must decide what proof a defendant seeking removal must produce to prove the amount-in-controversy requirement under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 ("CAFA"), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d), when the complaint does not include a facially apparent amount in controversy or the plaintiff may have understated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases