HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. v. PULSE ELECTRONICS, INC.

Nos. 2013-1472, 2013-1656.

769 F.3d 1371 (2014)

HALO ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PULSE ELECTRONICS, INC. and Pulse Electronics Corporation, Defendants-Cross Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

October 22, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William R. Woodford , Fish & Richardson P.C., of Minneapolis, MN, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Michael J. Kane of Minneapolis, MN, and Craig E. Countryman , of San Diego, CA.

Mark L. Hogge , Dentons U.S. LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendantscross appellants. With him on the brief were Shailendra K. Maheshwari , Charles R. Bruton , and Rajesh C. Noronha.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge O'MALLEY, with whom Circuit Judge HUGHES joins.


LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Halo Electronics, Inc. ("Halo") appeals from the decisions of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada (1) granting summary judgment that Pulse Electronics, Inc. and Pulse Electronics Corp. (collectively "Pulse") did not sell or offer to sell within the United States the accused products that Pulse manufactured, shipped, and delivered to buyers outside the United States, and thus that Pulse did not directly infringe Halo's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases