1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A. v. ECLINICAL WORKS, LLC
 

UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A. v. ECLINICAL WORKS, LLC

No. 2014-1005.

UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A., AND UNILOC USA, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ECLINICAL WORKS, LLC, AND PULSE SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

October 14, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

LAWRENCE M. HADLEY , McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C., of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was ALAN P. BLOCK ; and DANIEL L. GEYSER , of Dallas, Texas. Of counsel on the brief was JAMES L. ETHERIDGE , Etheridge Law Group, of Southlake, Texas.

KEITH M. AURZADA , Bryan Cave LLP, of Dallas, Texas, argued for defendant-appellee, eClinical Works, LLC. With him on the brief was JOHN C. BUSH , of Atlanta, Georgia. Of counsel on the brief was RYAN T. PUMPIAN , Bloom Sugarman Everett, LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia.

DON V. KELLY , Evans & Dixon, LLC, of Saint Louis, Missouri, argued for defendant-appellee, Pulse Systems, Inc.

MOORE, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is nonprecedential.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases