1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 764 F.3d
  5. 764 F.3d 1401 (2014)
 

FERRING B.V. v. WATSON LABORATORIES, INC.-FLORIDA

No. 2014-1416.

764 F.3d 1401 (2014)

FERRING B.V., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WATSON LABORATORIES, INC.-FLORIDA, Defendant-Appellant, and Apotex, Inc., and Apotex Corp., Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 22, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul W. Browning , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were James B. Monroe , Justin J. Hasford , and Mary E. Chlebowski.

B. Jefferson Boggs, Jr. , Merchant & Gould P.C., of Alexandria, VA, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Matthew L. Fedowitz ; Christopher J. Sorenson and Rachel C. Hughey , of Minneapolis, MN.

Before LOURIE, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges. LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Watson Laboratories, Inc. — Florida ("Watson") appeals from the decisions of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada (i) holding that the subject matter of the asserted claims of Ferring B.V.'s ("Ferring") U.S. Patents 7,947,739 (the "'739 patent"), 8,022,106 (the "'106 patent"), and 8,273,795 (the "'795 patent") would not have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103, (ii) finding that Watson's generic tranexamic acid product infringed those claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases