1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 764 F.3d
  5. 764 F.3d 1382 (2014)
 

FERRING B.V. v. WATSON LABORATORIES, INC.-FLA.

No. 2014-1377.

764 F.3d 1382 (2014)

FERRING B.V., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WATSON LABORATORIES, INC.-FLORIDA, Defendant, and Apotex, Inc., and Apotex Corp., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 22, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James B. Monroe , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Paul W. Browning , Justin J. Hasford and Mary E. Chlebowski.

Donald R. McPhail , Cozen O'Connor, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Barry P. Golob , Kerry B. McTigue , W. Blake Coblentz , and Aaron S. Lukas.

Before LOURIE, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.

DYK, Circuit Judge.

Ferring Corporation ("Ferring"), the owner of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,947,739 ("the '739 patent"), 8,022,106 ("the '106 patent"), and 8,273,795 ("the '795 patent") (collectively, the "patents-in-suit"), alleges that Apotex Corporation ("Apotex") infringed each and every claim of the patents-in-suit by filing an Abbreviated New Drug Application ("ANDA"). The United States District Court for the District of Nevada dismissed Ferring's claims as moot in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases