1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 763 F.3d
  5. 763 F.3d 881 (2014)
 

U.S. v. HARRIS

No. 13-1741.

763 F.3d 881 (2014)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Susan L. HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 18, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neal C. Hong , Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Fairview Heights, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Johanna M. Christiansen , Attorney, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Peoria, IL, John C. Taylor , Attorney, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Urbana, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before RIPPLE, WILLIAMS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

What makes a jury anonymous? That is the question posed by Susan Harris, who argues that she was improperly tried by an anonymous jury and that such a trial violated her due process rights. However, because Harris has not met her burden and shown one necessary component of an anonymous jury — that the parties were kept from knowing the potential jurors' names — we reject her argument and affirm her conviction.

I. BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases