HARTMAN v. EBSCO INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 13-3398.

758 F.3d 810 (2014)

Adam HARTMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EBSCO INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided July 10, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary A. Eaton , Attorney, Eaton & Sparks, Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

James Ronald Shaw , Attorney, Huie Fernambucq & Stewart, Birmingham, AL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before WOOD, Chief Judge, and POSNER and FLAUM, Circuit Judges.


FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Adam Hartman's father gave him a muzzleloading rifle in 1994. Like many older muzzleloaders, the gun was designed to use black powder as a propellant. As such, the muzzleloader ignited newer, pelletized propellants erratically. In 2008, Hartman installed a kit on his gun — sold by KR Warranty, the maker of the rifle — that modified the muzzleloader and enabled it to ignite new propellants more reliably. The next day, Hartman was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases