1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 757 F.3d
  5. 757 F.3d 1017 (2014)
 

AMBAT v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Nos. 11-16746, 11-16752, 11-17330.

757 F.3d 1017 (2014)

Mercy AMBAT, Plaintiff, and Zainabu Anderson; Sharon Castillo; Joanna Crotty; Patti Flynn; Teresa Fox; Lisa Janssen; Richard Lee; Gloria Martin; Anthony Peppers; Mattie Spiresmorgan; Yvette Williams; Roland Zanie; Pamela Walker; Gwendolyn Harvey-Noto; Jennifer Keeton; Olga Kincade; Emiko Theodoridis; Martha Ortega, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant-Appellee. Mercy Ambat, Plaintiff, and Jon Gray, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Appellee. Mercy Ambat, Plaintiff, and Zainabu Anderson; Sharon Castillo; Joanna Crotty; Patti Flynn; Teresa Fox; Lisa Janssen; Richard Lee; Gloria Martin; Anthony Peppers; Mattie Spiresmorgan; Yvette Williams; Roland Zanie; Pamela Walker; Gwendolyn Harvey-Noto; Jennifer Keeton; Olga Kincade; Emiko Theodoridis; Martha Ortega, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed July 2, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence D. Murray (argued) and Robert C. Strickland , Murray & Associates, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants Mercy Ambat, et al.

Daniel H. Bromberg (argued) and Timothy A. Butler , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant John Gray.

Dennis J. Herrera , City Attorney; Elizabeth S. Salveson , Chief Labor Attorney; and Rafal Ofierski , Deputy City Attorney (argued), San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: STEPHEN S. TROTT, SIDNEY R. THOMAS, and MARY H. MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

MURGUIA, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs, current and former deputies of the San Francisco Sheriff's Department ("SFSD"), appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment to the City and County of San Francisco (the "County") on their challenge to SFSD's policy prohibiting male deputies from supervising female inmates in the housing units of SFSD's jails. The district court concluded that SFSD's policy did not violate Title VII's prohibition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases