JACKSON v. BUCKMAN

No. 13-1165.

756 F.3d 1060 (2014)

Sarah JACKSON, Special Administrator for the Estate of Troy Allen Tucker, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Joseph BUCKMAN, Dr., St. Vincent Hospital; Pulaski County Detention Facility; Williams, Warden, Tucker Unit, ADC; James, Assistant Warden, Tucker Unit, ADC; — Cobbs, Major, Tucker Unit, ADC; Rectenwald, Dr., Tucker Unit, ADC, Defendants Doc Holladay, Sheriff, Pulaski County; originally sued as Doc Holiday; Carl Johnson, Dr., Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility; Catherine Smith, Nurse, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility; originally sued as C. Smith; Rhonda Anderson, Nurse, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility; originally sued as Anderson; Donna Washburn, Nurse, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility; originally sued as Washburn, Defendants-Appellees Wright, Deputy, Pulaski County Detention Facility; K. Lacking, Deputy, Pulaski County Detention Facility; Felix, Dr., Diagnostic Unit, ADC; Hall, Major, Diagnostic Unit, ADC; John Doe, Warden, Diagnostic Unit, ADC, Defendants Randy Morgan, Defendant-Appellee Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc., Defendant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Filed: June 27, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Amber Davis-Tanner , argued, Little Rock, AR ( Michael N. Shannon and Chad Pekron , Little Rock, AR, on the brief), for Appellant.

Patrick Lee Spivey , argued, Little Rock, AR ( Whitney F. Moore and David M. Fuqua , Little Rock, AR, on the brief), for Appellee Randy Morgan, Mr. Doc Holladay, Catherine Smith, and Donna Washburn.

Michael Alan Thompson , argued, Little Rock, AR ( Jerry Jon Sallings , Little Rock, AR, on the brief), for Appellee Rhonda Anderson.

Catherine Melissa Corless , argued, Little Rock, AR, for Appellee Carl Johnson.

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.


GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.

Troy Tucker brought this lawsuit alleging that, during his incarceration as a pretrial detainee, he received constitutionally deficient medical care and that medical officials used excessive force against him while responding to his medical emergency.1 The district court2 granted the defendants' motions for summary judgment with respect to Tucker's claims brought under 42 U.S.C. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases