1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 753 F.3d
  5. 753 F.3d 594 (2014)
 

Z TECHNOLOGIES CORP. v. LUBRIZOL CORP.

No. 13-1254.

753 F.3d 594 (2014)

Z TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The LUBRIZOL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: May 23, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Justin J. Hakala , Morgan & Meyers, PLC, Dearborn, Michigan, for Appellant. Elizabeth A. Grove , The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Justin J. Hakala , Morgan & Meyers, PLC, Dearborn, Michigan, for Appellant. Elizabeth A. Grove , The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio, for Appellee.

Before: DAUGHTREY, McKEAGUE, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

KEAGUE, Circuit Judge.

Z Technologies alleges that The Lubrizol Corporation violated the Sherman, Clayton, and analogous state-law antitrust acts by raising prices and enforcing a non-compete clause following Lubrizol's acquisition of the assets of another company, which established a monopoly in the market for petroleum wax-based oxidates. Lubrizol moved to dismiss the claim on the pleadings. The primary question presented on appeal is whether Z...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases