DISABLED IN ACTION v. BD. OF ELECTIONS IN NEW YORK

No. 12-4412-cv.

752 F.3d 189 (2014)

DISABLED IN ACTION, a nonprofit organization, United Spinal Association, a nonprofit organization, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Frederic M. Umane, in his official capacity as President of the Board of Elections in the City of New York, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided: May 14, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stuart Seaborn , Disability Rights Advocates, Berkeley, CA ( Sid Wolinsky and Christine Chuang , Disability Rights Advocates, Berkeley, CA, Julia Miriam Pinover , Disability Rights Advocates, New York, NY, Kevin Mintzer , The Law Office of Kevin Mintzer, P.C., New York, NY, and Mariann Meier Wang , Cuti Hecker Wang LLP, New York, NY, on the brief), for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Drake A. Colley ( Edward F.X. Hart , on the brief), for Michael A. Cardozo , Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellants.

Alicia M. Simmons , Assistant U.S. Attorney ( Benjamin H. Torrance , Assistant U.S. Attorney, on the brief), for Preet Bharara , United States Attorney of the Southern District of New York, New York, NY, and Jocelyn Samuels , Acting Assistant Attorney General ( Dennis J. Dimsey and Sasha SambergChampion , Attorneys), Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice, for Amicus Curiae United States of America.

Before: CABRANES, HALL, and CHIN, Circuit Judges.


CHIN, Circuit Judge:

The Board of Elections in the City of New York (the "BOE") is responsible for identifying and designating poll sites that are accessible to voters with disabilities in New York City. In this case, plaintiffs-appellees, non-profit organizations representing people with mobility or vision disabilities (collectively "plaintiffs"), allege that BOE is failing to provide them with meaningful access to its voting program, in violation of Section 504...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases