1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 751 F.3d
  5. 751 F.3d 1327 (2014)
 

INTOUCH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. VGO COMMUNICATIONS

No. 2013-1201.

751 F.3d 1327 (2014)

InTOUCH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., doing business as InTouch Health, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VGO COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 9, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald R. Ware , Foley Hoag LLP, of Boston, MA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Sarah Cooleybeck and Brian C. Carroll. Of counsel was Joseph S. Cianfrani , Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, of Irvine, CA.

Lauren B. Fletcher , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, MA, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief were William F. Lee and Sarah R. Frazier. Of counsel on the brief were Marc E. Hankin and Kevin Schraven , Hankin Patent Law, APC, of Los Angeles, CA.

Before RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

O'MALLEY, Circuit Judge.

The world has come a long way; this is a patent case about robots. InTouch Technologies, Inc. d/b/a InTouch Health ("InTouch") and VGo Communications, Inc. ("VGo") both manufacture remote telepresence robot systems. In 2012, InTouch filed a First Amended Complaint in the Central District of California alleging that VGo's remote telepresence robot system infringed several of its patents, including...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases