1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 748 F.3d
  5. 748 F.3d 217 (2014)
 

SANTORO v. ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC

No. 12-2561.

748 F.3d 217 (2014)

Armand SANTORO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC; Accenture LLP, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided May 5, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Stephen Z. Chertkof , Heller, Huron, Chertkof, Lerner, Simon & Salzman, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Jonathan F. Cohn , Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Eric D. McArthur , Paul J. Ray , Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge SHEDD wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY and Judge KEENAN joined.

SHEDD, Circuit Judge:

Dr. Armand Santoro appeals the district court's order granting the motion by Accenture Federal Services, LLC (Accenture) to compel arbitration. Because we agree with the district court that the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank) does not invalidate the arbitration agreement between Accenture and Santoro, we affirm.

I.

Santoro began his employment with Accenture in 1997 as a senior...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases