U.S. v. CLARK

No. 11-3072.

747 F.3d 890 (2014)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Reginald CLARK, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided April 4, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jessica L. Ellsworth , appointed by the court, argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs were Peter S. Spivack and Matthew J. Iaconetti , appointed by the court.

Katherine M. Kelly , Assistant U.S. Attorney, argued the cause for appellee. With her on the brief were Ronald C. Machen, Jr. , U.S. Attorney, and Elizabeth Trosman , Assistant U.S. Attorney.

Before: ROGERS and TATEL, Circuit Judges, and RANDOLPH, Senior Circuit Judge.


TATEL, Circuit Judge:

Challenging his conviction for bank and wire fraud, Appellant contends that the district court erroneously denied his Batson challenge and wrongly admitted certain evidence. Appellant also argues that the district court violated the Ex Post Facto Clause by calculating his sixty-three-month sentence on the basis of guidelines adopted subsequent to his crimes, applied an unwarranted aggravating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases