1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 745 F.3d
  5. 745 F.3d 1235 (2014)
 

WALLACE v. DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC.

No. 13-2214.

745 F.3d 1235 (2014)

Carl WALLACE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 26, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ON BRIEF: Brian P. Parker , Bingham Farms, Michigan, for Appellant. Charity Olson , Olson Law Group, Ann Arbor, Michigan, for Appellee.

BEFORE: SUHRHEINRICH, ROGERS and SUTTON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

This is a case about prepositions — about the difference, if any, between "of" and "after" as used here. Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, a collector dunning another for payment must notify the individual that it will assume the validity of the debt unless he disputes it "within thirty days after receipt of the notice." 15 U.S.C. § 1692g(a)(3). Diversified Consultants wrote to Carl Wallace that it would...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases