1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 744 F.3d
  5. 744 F.3d 1325 (2014)
 

DANISCO U.S. INC. v. NOVOZYMES A/S

No. 2013-1214.

744 F.3d 1325 (2014)

DANISCO U.S. INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NOVOZYMES A/S and Novozymes North America, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 11, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas G. Hungar , Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Tracey B. Davies , Michael A. Valek , and Jason C. McKenney , of Dallas, TX.

David K. Tellekson , Fenwick & West, LLP, of Seattle, WA, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Virginia K. Demarchi , and Ewa M. Davison.

Before LOURIE, PROST, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Danisco U.S. Inc. ("Danisco") appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissing Danisco's declaratory judgment action against Novozymes A/S and Novozymes North America, Inc. (collectively "Novozymes") for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Danisco U.S. Inc. v. Novozymes A/S, No. 12-4502, 2013 WL 2351723 (N.D.Cal. Jan. 8, 2013) (unpublished). Because we conclude that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases