GREATER L.A. AGENCY ON DEAFNESS v. CABLE NEWS NET.

No. 12-15807.

742 F.3d 871 (2014)

GREATER LOS ANGELES AGENCY ON DEAFNESS, INC.; Daniel Jacob; Edward Kelly; Jennifer Olson, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., incorrectly sued as Time Warner Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 5, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas R. Burke (argued), Rochelle L. Wilcox , Janet L. Grumer , Jeff Glasser , Davis Wright Tremaine , San Francisco, CA; Ronald London , Davis Wright Tremaine , Washington, D.C., for Defendant-Appellant.

Laurence W. Paradis (argued), Mary-Lee K. Smith , and Michael Nunez , Disability Rights Advocates, Berkeley, CA; Linda M. Dardarian and Jason H. Tarricone , Goldstein, Demchak, Bailer, Borgen & Dardarian, Oakland, CA; Peter Blanck , Syracuse, NY, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Karl Olson , Ram, Olson, Cereghino & Kopczynski, San Francisco, CA, for Amici Curiae Los Angeles Times Communications LLC, McClatchy Newspapers, Inc., Hearst Corporation, California Newspaper Publishers Association, and California Broadcasters Association.

John F. Waldo , Portland, Oregon, for Amici Curiae Washington State Communication Access Project, Oregon Communication Access Project, Association of Late Deafened Adults (ALDA), Aloha State (Hawaii) Association of the Deaf, Arizona Association of the Deaf, California Association of the Deaf, Nevada Association of the Deaf, Idaho Association of the Deaf, and Oregon Association of the Deaf.

Howard A. Rosenblum and Andrew S. Phillips , National Association of the Deaf, Silver Spring, MD; Blake E. Reid and Angela J. Campbell , Institute for Public Representation, Georgetown Law, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae Telecommunications for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Inc., National Association of the Deaf, and the Hearing Loss Association of America.

Before: J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, M. MARGARET McKEOWN, and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.


ORDER CERTIFYING QUESTION TO CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT

ORDER

We respectfully ask the California Supreme Court to answer the certified question set forth below. The answer to this question will determine the outcome of this appeal, and there is no controlling precedent in the decisions of the California Supreme Court. Although we are mindful that our certification request adds to the burgeoning caseload of the California Supreme Court, this case raises an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases