MIDDLETON v. SHINSEKI

No. 2013-7014.

743 F.3d 1356 (2014)

Birdeye L. MIDDLETON, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 3, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Einar Stole , Covington & Burling LLP, of Washington, DC, filed a petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc for claimant-appellant. With him on the petition was Michael S. Sawyer. Of counsel on the petition were Barton F. Stichman and Katy Schuman Clemens , National Veterans Legal Services Program, of Washington, DC.

Michael P. Goodman , Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, filed a response to the petition for respondent-appellee. On the response were Stuart F. Delery , Assistant Attorney General, Bryant G. Snee , Acting Director, and Scott D. Austin , Assistant Director. Of counsel on the response were Michael J. Timinski , Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and Meghan Alphonso , Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC.

David J. Lewis , Sidley Austin LLP, of Washington, DC, for amici curiae The American Legion and Vietnam Veterans of America. Of counsel on the brief was Philip B. Onderdonk , The American Legion, of Indianapolis, Indiana, for amicus curiae The American Legion.

Before RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, PLAGER, LOURIE, DYK, PROST, MOORE, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.


ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

A combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc was filed by claimant-appellant, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by respondent-appellee. The petition for rehearing was referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and response were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases