1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 734 F.3d
  5. 734 F.3d 585 (2013)
 

SANTIAGO v. RINGLE

No. 12-4075.

734 F.3d 585 (2013)

Oscar SANTIAGO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Kurt RINGLE and Dr. Constance Mosher, individually, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: November 5, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Rickell Howard , Ohio Justice & Policy Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Debra Gorrell Wehrle , Office of the Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Rickell Howard , David Singleton , Ohio Justice & Policy Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Debra Gorrell Wehrle , Office of the Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellees.

Before: COLE, KETHLEDGE, and STRANCH, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

COLE, Circuit Judge.

After a delay in receiving dermatologist-recommended treatments for a painful skin condition, inmate Oscar Santiago sued his prison doctors under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He claimed violation of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. The district court initially denied the doctors' motion for summary judgment, but on a motion to reconsider the court entered summary judgment in favor of the doctors....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases