1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 733 F.3d
  5. 733 F.3d 329 (2013)
 

IN RE BIEDERMANN

No. 2013-1080.

733 F.3d 329 (2013)

In re Lutz BIEDERMANN and Jurgen Harms.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

October 18, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Luke Dauchot , Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were Nimalka R. Wickramasekera and Benjamin A. Herbert . Of counsel on the brief was Mark Garscia , Christie, Parker & Hale, LLP, of Glendale, CA.

Monica B. Lateef , Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were Nathan K. Kelley , Deputy Solicitor, and Amy J. Nelson , Associate Solicitor.

Before MOORE, LINN, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

LINN, Circuit Judge.

Lutz Biedermann and Jurgen Harms (collectively "Biedermann") appeal a decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences ("Board"), now the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, affirming the rejection of claims 32, 33, 35-37 37, 39, and 48 of U.S. Patent Application No. 10/306,057 ("'057 Application") for obviousness, 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). Ex parte Biedermann, No. 2010-006113, Application No. 10/306,057, 2012 WL 3561836 (B.P.A.I. Aug...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases