1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 730 F.3d
  5. 730 F.3d 427 (2013)
 

SPRING STREET PARTNERS-IV, L.P. v. LAM

No. 12-20517.

730 F.3d 427 (2013)

SPRING STREET PARTNERS-IV, L.P., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Long K. LAM; En Kha Lam; Ten Lam; Vinh Ngo, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

September 13, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Eugene Mitchell (argued), Baker & McKenzie, L.L.P., Thomas S. Leatherbury, Esq. , Daniel L. Tobey, Esq. , Vinson & Elkins, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Allan Richard Brain, Esq. (argued), Attorney, Houston, TX, for Defendants-Appellants Long K. Lam and En Kha Lam.

Hung Michael Nguyen (argued), Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellants Ten Lam and Vinh Ngo.

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and JONES, Circuit Judges.

CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge:

Defendants-Appellants Long K. Lam, En Kha Lam, Ten Lam, and Vinh Ngo appeal from the district court's summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee Spring Street Partners-IV, L.P. on its claims for fraudulent transfer and piercing the corporate veil of a limited liability company. We AFFIRM IN PART and VACATE AND REMAND IN PART.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

A. The Financial Obligations

Between 2001 and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases