1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 734 F.3d
  5. 734 F.3d 871 (2013)
 

RICHARDS v. ERNST & YOUNG, LLP

No. 11-17530.

734 F.3d 871 (2013)

Michelle RICHARDS, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ERNST & YOUNG, LLP, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 21, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rex S. Heinke , Gregory William Knopp , Katharine Jane Galston , Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Max Folkenflik , Folkenflik & McGerity, New York, NY; H. Tim Hoffman , Arthur William Lazear , Ross L. Libenson , for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, KENNETH F. RIPPLE, and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Defendant Ernst & Young, LLP appeals the district court's denial of its motion to compel arbitration of state wage and hour claims asserted by its former employee, Michelle Richards.1 The defendant filed the motion after the Supreme Court's decision in AT & T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011). The district court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases