1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 726 F.3d
  5. 726 F.3d 1118 (2013)
 

URBINO v. ORKIN SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.

Nos. 11-56944, 11-57002, 12-55064.

726 F.3d 1118 (2013)

John URBINO, for himself and on behalf of other current and former employees, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. ORKIN SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a Delaware corporation, and Rollins, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants. John Urbino, for himself and on behalf of other current and former employees, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. Orkin Services of California, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Rollins, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees. John Urbino, for himself and on behalf of other current and former employees, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Orkin Services of California, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Rollins, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 13, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theodore R. Scarborough (argued), Robert N. Hochman , and Tacy F. Flint , Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL; John E. Lattin , Fisher & Phillips LLP, Irvine, CA; Christopher C. Hoffman , Fisher & Phillips LLP, San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees (No. 11-56944, 11-57002), Defendants-Appellees (12-55064).

Kenneth H. Yoon (argued) and Stephanie E. Yasuda , Law Offices of Kenneth H. Yoon, Los Angeles, CA; Peter M. Hart and Amber S. Healy , Law Offices of Peter M. Hart, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant (No. 11-56944, 11-57002), Plaintiff-Appellant (12-55064).

Before: MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, SIDNEY R. THOMAS, and ANDREW D. HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

HAWKINS, Senior Circuit Judge:

This interlocutory appeal deals with a unique statute concerning the claims of California residents against the owners and operators of California-based enterprises. Brought originally in state court, it has been removed to federal court on the theory that the individual claims, when aggregated, meet the minimum requirements of diversity jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction to review the district court's refusal to remand...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases