SUTHERLAND v. ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Docket No. 12-304-cv.

726 F.3d 290 (2013)

Stephanie SUTHERLAND, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ERNST & YOUNG LLP, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided: August 9, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rex S. Heinke ( Gregory W. Knopp , Katharine J. Galston , Daniel L. Nash , on the brief), Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Los Angeles, CA and Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant Ernst & Young LLP.

Max Folkenflik ( H. Tim Hoffman , Arthur W. Lazear , Ross L. Libenson , Hoffman & Lazear, Oakland, CA, on the brief), Folkenflik & McGerity, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellee Stephanie Sutherland.

P. David Lopez , Lorraine C. Davis , Daniel T. Vail , Paul D. Ramshaw , Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

M. Patricia Smith , Steven J. Mandel , Paul L. Frieden , Edward D. Sieger , Dean A. Romhilt , United States Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae United States Department of Labor.

Dan C. Getman , Michael J.D. Sweeney , Lesley Tse , Getman & Sweeney PLLC, New Paltz, NY; Rebecca M. Hamburg , National Employment Lawyers Association, San Francisco, CA, for Amici Curiae National Employment Lawyers Association, the National Employment Law Project, The Employee Rights Advocacy Institute for Law & Policy.

Before: WINTER, CABRANES, and STRAUB, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

The question presented in this appeal is whether an employee can invalidate a class-action waiver provision in an arbitration agreement when that waiver removes the financial incentive for her to pursue a claim under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. In light of the supervening decision of the Supreme Court in American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, ___ U.S. ___, 133 S...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases