1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 724 F.3d
  5. 724 F.3d 1343 (2013)
 

PLANTRONICS, INC. v. ALIPH, INC.

No. 2012-1355.

724 F.3d 1343 (2013)

PLANTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALIPH, INC. and Aliphcom, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 31, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kara F. Stoll , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With her on the brief was Jason W. Melvin. Of counsel on the brief were David C. Bohrer , Confluence Law Partners, of San Jose, CA, and Bruce G. Chapman , Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP, of Los Angeles, CA.

Robert P. Feldman , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, of Redwood Shores, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Daniel H. Bromberg and Dane W. Reinstedt.

Before RADER, Chief Judge, O'MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.

WALLACH, Circuit Judge.

In this patent infringement case, Plantronics, Inc. ("Plantronics") filed suit alleging that Aliph, Inc. and Aliphcom, Inc.'s (collectively, "Aliph") products infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,712,453, entitled "Concha Headset Stabilizer" (the "'453 patent"). On March 23, 2012, the district court granted-in-part Aliph's motion for summary judgment of noninfringement and invalidity, construing certain disputed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases