HAWKINS v. U.S.

No. 11-1245.

724 F.3d 915 (2013)

Bernard HAWKINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

July 31, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julius L. Loeser , James R. Thompson, Jr. , Thomas G. Weber , Sean G. Wieber (argued), Attorneys, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Gary Bell , David E. Hollar (argued), Attorneys, Office of the United States Attorney, Hammond, IN, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before POSNER, KANNE, and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.


POSNER, Circuit Judge.

This opinion, a supplement to the panel opinion reported at 706 F.3d 820, explains why a majority of the panel does not believe that rehearing is warranted by the Supreme Court's decision in Peugh v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 133 S.Ct. 2072, 186 L.Ed.2d 84 (2013), rendered after the panel opinion.

The panel had held that an error in calculating a defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases