LACSON v. U.S. DEPT. OF HOMELAND SEC.

No. 11-1447.

726 F.3d 170 (2013)

Jose LACSON, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and Transportation Security Administration, Respondents.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided July 23, 2013.

Unsealed July 30, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence Berger argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

Edward Himmelfarb , Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the briefs were Stuart F. Delery , Acting Assistant Attorney General, and Mark B. Stern and Sharon Swingle , Attorneys.

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge GARLAND.


GARLAND, Chief Judge:

Like many people, Jose Lacson posted things online that he should not have. The problem is that, unlike most people, Lacson was a Federal Air Marshal. And the things he posted did not concern relationships gone awry or parties that he should have avoided. Instead, he wrote about the number of air marshals the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) had hired in recent years, the locations of their assignments, and the rates of attrition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases