U.S. v. BEY

No. 12-1592.

725 F.3d 643 (2013)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Prince T. BEY, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided July 9, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marc Krickbaum (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Nicholas D. O'Conner (argued), Locke Lord LLP, Stephen R. Swofford , Attorneys, Hinshaw & Culbertson, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before POSNER, WOOD, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

Prince Bey appeals his conviction for conspiring to possess heroin with intent to distribute and for aiding and abetting the distribution of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and § 846. Bey alleges three errors on appeal: first, that the district court erred by not instructing the jury on an entrapment defense; second, that there was insufficient evidence of conspiracy to allow the admission into evidence

Let's get started


Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases