WATKINS v. VITAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

No. 13-55755.

720 F.3d 1179 (2013)

Gabe WATKINS, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VITAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed July 2, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony G. Brazil , Richard H. Nakamura, Jr. , and David J. Vendler , Morris Polich & Purdy LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Lionel Z. Glancy , Marc L. Godino , and Casey E. Sadler , Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before: SIDNEY R. THOMAS, BARRY G. SILVERMAN, and RAYMOND C. FISHER, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Defendant-Appellant Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. appeals the district court's sua sponte order remanding this putative class action to state court for failure to establish the Class Action Fairness Act's (CAFA) requirement that at least $5 million is in controversy. We hold that we have appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1453(c)(1) to consider the district court's sua sponte remand order, reverse the order remanding this case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases