U.S. v. KRIESEL

No. 11-30197.

720 F.3d 1137 (2013)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Edward KRIESEL, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed June 28, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Colin A. Fieman (argued), Assistant Federal Public Defender, Tacoma, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Jonathan Y. Ellis (argued), Jenny A. Durkan and Helen J. Brunner , United States Attorney's Office, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gary W. Manca , Manca Law, PLLC, Seattle, Washington; Douglas B. Klunder , ACLU of Washington Foundation, Seattle, WA, for Amicus Curiae American Civil Liberties Union of Washington.

Dissent by Judge Reinhardt.


OPINION

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

Government and commercial entities enjoy increasing capacity to obtain, store, and analyze information about people, giving rise to increasing concerns about privacy. Nowhere is that upward spiral more evident than in litigation, like this case, calling into question practices relating to identifying people through their deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequences.

The appellant here, Thomas Kriesel, pled guilty to a drug...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases