WYETH AND CORDIS CORPORATION, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants,
v.
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., and Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Defendants Counterclaimants-Appellees, and
Medtronic Inc., Medtronic Vascular, Inc., and Medtronic USA, Inc., Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellees, and
Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc., Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Matthew M. Wolf , Arnold & Porter, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants/counterclaimants-appellees Boston Scientific Corporation, et al. With him on the brief were Edward Han and John E. Nilsson .
Before MOORE, BRYSON, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Wyeth and Cordis Corporation (Wyeth) appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey's grant of summary judgment that claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No. 5,516,781 ('781 patent) and claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,563,146 ('146 patent) are invalid for nonenablement.1Wyeth v. Abbott Labs., Nos. 3:08-cv-0230 and -1021, 2012 WL 175023 (D.N.J. Jan. 19, 2012). Because we hold that there is no genuine...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.