HAKIM v. ACCENTURE U.S. PENSION PLAN

No. 11-3438.

718 F.3d 675 (2013)

Omar HAKIM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ACCENTURE UNITED STATES PENSION PLAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided May 23, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew Hall Armstrong , Attorney, Armstrong Law Firm, St. Louis, MO, Mary L. Perry (argued), Attorney, Law Office of Mary L. Perry, Clayton, MO, Douglas A. Terry , Attorney, Nelson Roselius Terry & Morton, Edmond, OK, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Mark Casciari (argued), Attorney, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before FLAUM, MANION, and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.


MANION, Circuit Judge.

In this ERISA action, we determine whether a release of claims signed by a former employee in exchange for a severance package is valid and enforceable. Omar Hakim was an employee of Accenture LLP (previously Andersen Consulting LLP) for nearly ten years before being let go as part of a workforce reduction in 2003. During part of his tenure with the company, he participated in the company's pension plan. In 1996, Accenture amended the plan to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases