S.E.C. v. BANKOSKY

Docket No. 12-2943-cv.

716 F.3d 45 (2013)

SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brent C. BANKOSKY, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided: May 14, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allan A. Capute , Special Counsel to the Solicitor, for Michael A. Conley , Deputy General Counsel and Jacob H. Stillman , Solicitor, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert G. Heim , Meyers & Heim LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: WALKER and CHIN, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge.


PER CURIAM:

In this case, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") accused defendant-appellant Brent C. Bankosky of engaging in insider trading, in violation of sections 10(b) and 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78n(e), and SEC Rules 10b-5 and 14e-3. After the entry of a consent judgment, in which Bankosky neither admitted nor denied the allegations in the complaint, the SEC moved for an officer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases