1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 715 F.3d
  5. 715 F.3d 1019 (2013)
 

U.S. v. ROUX

No. 10-2192.

715 F.3d 1019 (2013)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael ROUX, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided May 10, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard N. Cox (argued), Joseph H. Hartzler , Attorneys, Office of the United States Attorney, Springfield, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Martin J. Pruhs (argued), Attorney, Pruhs Law Office, S.C., Milwaukee, WI, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before ROVNER, WILLIAMS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

ROVNER, Circuit Judge.

A jury convicted defendant-appellant Michael Roux of inducing or coercing a minor to create sexually explicit images, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). Roux appeals, contending that the district court erred in admitting certain evidence against him and that the government committed certain missteps at trial which should have prompted the court to declare a mistrial. Finding no error in any of the district court's rulings, and being satisfied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases