Robert PEREZ; Nancy Art; Brett Harbach, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
NIDEK CO., LTD.; Nidek Incorporated; Nidek Technologies Incorporated; Manjov V. Motwani, M.D.; Gary M. Kawesch, M.D.; Linda Vu, M.D.; Joseph Lee, M.D.; Farzad Yaghouti, M.D.; Randa M. Garrana, M.D.; Thomas S. Tooma, M.D.; Paul C. Lee, M.D.; Keith Liang, M.D.; Antoine L. Garabet, M.D.; William Ellis, M.D.; Gregg Feinerman, M.D.; Michael Rose, M.D.; John Kownacki, M.D.; Steven Ma, M.D.; Estate of Glenn A. Kawesch, M.D.; TLC Vision Corporation, dba TLC Laser Eye Center, Inc.; California Center for Refractive Surgery, a medical corporation; Laser Eye Center Medical Office, Inc.; Southwest Eye Care Center Inc.; Does, 1 through 1000, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
James J. Wallace, II , La Follette Johnson De Haas Fesler & Ames, APC, San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellees Manjov V. Motwani, M.D., and Keith Liang, M.D.
Gregory Dale Werre , Bonne, Bridges, Mueller, O'Keefe & Nichols, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees William Ellis, M.D., Gregg A. Feinerman, M.D., Randa M. Garrana, M.D., Joseph Lee, M.D., and Linda Vu, M.D.
Albert E. Cressey, III , Reback, McAndrews, Kjar, Warford & Stockalper, Manhattan Beach, CA, for Defendant-Appellee Thomas S. Tooma, M.D.
H. Steven Schiffres , Rosoff, Schiffres & Barta, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee Michael Rose, M.D.
Gregory M. Hulbert , Gonzalez and Hulbert, LLP, Glendale, CA, for Defendant-Appellee John Kownacki, M.D.
Before: STEPHEN S. TROTT, ANDREW J. KLEINFELD, and M. MARGARET McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
OPINION
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
We are asked to decide whether patients who suffered no injuries but who were subject to the off-label use of a medical device for eye surgeries may bring suit solely because the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") status of the device was not disclosed to them. The Third Amended Complaint ("the Complaint") does not state a claim under the California Protection of Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation Act ("the Human...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.