1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 710 F.3d
  5. 710 F.3d 209 (2013)
 

GLYNN v. EDO CORP.

No. 12-1160.

710 F.3d 209 (2013)

Dennis P. GLYNN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EDO CORPORATION; Impact Science & Technology, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and Michael Caprario; Foster-Miller, Inc.; Dean Puzzo; James D. Martin; Cadqal Development, Inc., Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided: March 21, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Adam Augustine Carter , The Employment Law Group, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. William G. Miossi , Winston & Strawn, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. ON BRIEF: R. Scott Oswald , The Employment Law Group, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Ryan S. Spiegel , Alia Ornstein , Winston & Strawn, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge AGEE and Judge WYNN joined.

OPINION

GREGORY, Circuit Judge:

In this False Claims Act ("FCA"), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733, retaliation action, Plaintiff-Appellant Dennis Glynn ("Glynn") argues that Defendant-Appellee Impact Science & Technology ("IST") and its parent company, EDO Corporation, fired Glynn because he reported IST to the government for what he believed to be fraudulent conduct. We agree with the district court that Glynn was not engaged in activity that qualified...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases