MASSACHUSETTS v. U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM'N

Nos. 12-1404, 12-1772.

708 F.3d 63 (2013)

Commonwealth of MASSACHUSETTS, Petitioner, v. U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION; the United States of America, Respondents, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Entergy Nuclear Generation Company, Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

February 25, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew Brock , Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Environmental Protection Division, with whom Martha Coakley , Attorney General, was on brief, for petitioner.

James E. Adler , Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, with whom Ignacia S. Moreno , Assistant Attorney General, J. David Gutner II , Attorney, Appellate Section, Environmental and Natural Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Marian L. Zobler, Acting General Counsel, John F. Cordes, Jr. , Solicitor, and Lauren Woodall , Attorney, Office of General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, were on brief, for respondents.

Kevin P. Martin , with whom Elise N. Zoli , Goodwin Procter LLP, David R. Lewis , Paul A. Gaukler , Timothy J.V. Walsh , and Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, were on brief, for intervenors Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. and Entergy Nuclear Generation Company.

Before LYNCH, Chief Judge, TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge, and DiCLERICO, District Judge.


LYNCH, Chief Judge.

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts petitions for review from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's ("NRC" or "Commission") March 8, 2012 order denying the Commonwealth's petition for review of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's ("ASLB") denial of Massachusetts's motion to admit a new contention, and other related requests (12-1404). The NRC rejected the Commonwealth's claims that the environmental findings in the environmental impact statement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases