1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 705 F.3d
  5. 705 F.3d 295 (2013)
 

U.S. v. CHANTHARATH

Nos. 12-1273, 12-1620.

705 F.3d 295 (2013)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Viengxay CHANTHARATH, Defendant-Appellant United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Patricio Guzman-Ortiz, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Filed: January 28, 2013.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied February 26, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Wade Clayton , argued, Sioux Falls, SD, for appellant Chantharath in 12-1273.

James Arthur Eirinberg , argued, Sioux Falls, SD, for appellant Guzman-Ortiz in 12-1620.

John E. Haak , USA, argued, Sioux Falls, SD, for appellee.

Before RILEY, Chief Judge, BEAM and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

RILEY, Chief Judge.

A jury convicted Viengxay Chantharath and Patricio Guzman-Ortiz of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Chantharath and Guzman-Ortiz both challenge their convictions and sentences. Chantharath challenges the district court's1 denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases