SUGGS v. U.S.

No. 10-3944.

705 F.3d 279 (2013)

Alonzo SUGGS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided January 17, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Palmer (argued), Mitchel Ramirez , Attorneys, May, Oberfell & Lorber, Mishawaka, IN, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Robert L. Garrison , Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Criminal Division, Fairview Heights, IL, Benjamin J. Horwich (argued), Attorney, Department of Justice Office of the Solicitor General, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before MANION, SYKES, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

This appeal depends on a nuance of habeas corpus practice under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA). The specific issue is whether a second-in-time motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is barred as "second or successive" when a prisoner has been resentenced pursuant to a successful first section 2255 motion, and the new motion challenges only the underlying conviction, not the resentencing. The Supreme Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases