INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS v. INT'L TRADE COM'N

No. 2010-1093.

707 F.3d 1295 (2013)

INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC and InterDigital Technology Corporation, Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and Nokia Inc. and Nokia Corporation, Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

January 10, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick J. Flinn , Alston & Bird LLP, of Atlanta, GA, filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc for intervenors. With him on the petition were John Haynes , of Atlanta, GA, and Ross R. Barton , of Charlotte, NC. Of counsel on the petition was Paul D. Clement , Bancroft PLLC, of Washington, DC.

Donald R. Dunner , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, of Washington, DC, filed a response to the petition for appellants. With him on the response were Allen M. Sokal , Don O. Burley , Smith R. Brittingham IV , and Houtan Khalili Esfahani , of Washington, DC, and Christopher P. Isaac , of Reston, VA. Of counsel on the response were Seth P. Waxman and William G. McElwain , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Washington, DC, and Mark C. Fleming and Lauren B. Fletcher , of Boston, MA.

Megan M. Valentine , Attorney Advisor, Office of General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, filed a response to the petition for appellee. With her on the response were Dominic L. Bianchi , Acting General Counsel, and Andrea C. Casson , Assistant General Counsel for Litigation.

Daryl Joseffer , King & Spalding LLP, of Washington, DC, filed a response to the petition for amici curiae Hewlett-Packard Co., et al. With him on the response were Jeffrey Telep and Adam Conrad.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BRYSON. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A combined petition for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc was filed by Intervenors, and responses to the petition were invited by the court and filed by Appellants and Appellee. By leave of court, a response to the petition was filed by Hewlett-Packard Co., et al., as amici curiae. The petition for rehearing and responses were considered by the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and responses...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases