1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. REESE v. VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC.
 

REESE v. VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC.

No. 2012-1048.

MORRIS REESE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and AT&T CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided December 21, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

RACHEL CLARK HUGHEY , Merchant & Gould, P.C., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

MICHAEL J. SONGER , Crowell & Morning, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for both defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were JENNIFER H. BURDMAN , for defendant-appellee, AT&T California; and KEVIN P. ANDERSON and JAMES H. WALLACE , Wiley Rein LLP, of Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee Verizon California.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge MOORE.

This disposition is nonprecedential.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Morris Reese ("Reese") appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissing his first amended complaint against Verizon California Inc. ("Verizon") and AT&T California ("AT&T") (collectively, "Appellees") based on the doctrine of collateral estoppel. Order Granting Defs.' Mot. to Dismiss, Reese v. Verizon Cal. Inc., No. 11...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases