IGT v. ALLIANCE GAMING CORPORATION

No. 2011-1166.

702 F.3d 1338 (2012)

IGT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALLIANCE GAMING CORPORATION, Bally Gaming International, Inc., and Bally Gaming, Inc. (Doing Business as Bally Gaming & Systems), Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

December 17, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Deanne E. Maynard , Morrison & Foerster LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With her on the brief were Alexander J. Hadjis , Brian R. Matsui and Marc A. Hearron . Of counsel on the brief was Brett J. Williamson , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, of Newport Beach, CA.

Jennifer A. Kash , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, of San Francisco, CA, argued for defendants-appellants. With her on the brief were Charles K. Verhoeven and Kevin A. Smith .

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge REYNA. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge BRYSON.


REYNA, Circuit Judge.

IGT owns several patents related to "wheel games," a type of casino gaming machine containing a secondary bonus game incorporating a spinning wheel. IGT sued Alliance Gaming Corp., Bally Gaming International, Inc., and Bally Gaming, Inc. (collectively, "Bally") for infringement of these patents, and Bally counterclaimed under state and federal antitrust laws. The district court denied the motions for summary judgment on the antitrust issues,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases