1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 701 F.3d
  5. 701 F.3d 698 (2012)
 

OSRAM SYLVANIA v. AMERICAN INDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES

Nos. 2012-1091, 2012-1135.

701 F.3d 698 (2012)

OSRAM SYLVANIA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN INDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

December 13, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregg F. Locascio , Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Nathan S. Mammen and Leslie M. Schmidt . Of counsel on the brief was Steven M. Coyle , Cantor Colburn LLP, of Hartford, CT.

Glenn W. Trost , Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz, LLP, of Los Angeles, CA, argued for defendant-cross appellant.

Before O'MALLEY, PLAGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.

O'MALLEY, Circuit Judge.

OSRAM SYLVANIA, Inc., ("OSRAM") appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment of invalidity of claims 1, 17, 25, 27, and 32 of U.S. Patent No. 5,834,905 (the "'905 patent"), issued to Valery A. Godyak et al., and assigned to OSRAM. Because we find genuine issues of material fact that preclude a finding of anticipation and obviousness on summary judgment, and because we find that the district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases