SANDISK CORP. v. KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY CO., INC.

No. 2011-1346.

695 F.3d 1348 (2012)

SANDISK CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY CO., INC. and Kingston Technology Corp., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

October 9, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory A. Castanias , Jones Day, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Douglas R. Cole , of Columbus, OH. Of counsel were Victoria Dorfman , of New York, NY, and Tharan G. Lanier , of Palo Alto, CA.

David M. Barkan , Fish & Richardson P.C. of Redwood City, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was David Hoffman , of Austin, TX. Of counsel on the brief was Christine Yang , Law Offices of S.J. Christine Yang, of Fountain Valley, CA. Of counsel was Alan D. Smith , of Boston, MA.

Before PROST, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.


Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge PROST. Opinion concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge REYNA.

PROST, Circuit Judge.

SanDisk Corporation ("Sandisk") sued Kingston Technology Co., Inc. and Kingston Technology Corp. (collectively "Kingston") for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,719,808 ("'808 patent"), 6,149,316 ("'316 Patent"), 6,426,893 ("'893 patent"), 6,757,842 ("'842 patent"), and 6,763,424 ("'424 patent"). After the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases